On the off chance that the principal freebet in the “if” bet loses, there is no wagered in the subsequent group. Regardless of whether the subsequent group wins of loses, your complete misfortune on the “if” bet would be $110 when you lose in the main group. On the off chance that the primary group wins, in any case, you would have a wagered of $110 to win $100 going in the subsequent group. All things considered, if the subsequent group loses, your complete misfortune would be only the $10 of vig on the split of the two groups. On the off chance that the two matches dominate, you would win $100 in Team An and $100 in Team B, for an absolute success of $200. Hence, the most extreme misfortune on an “if” would be $110, and the greatest success would be $200. This is adjusted by the hindrance of losing the full $110, rather than only $10 of vig, each time the groups split with the main group in the bet losing.
As should be obvious, it’s anything but an extraordinary arrangement which game you put first in an “if” bet. On the off chance that you put the washout first in a split, you lose your full bet. In the event that you split however the washout is the second group in the bet, then, at that point you just lose the vig.
Bettors before long found that the best approach to keep away from the vulnerability brought about by the request for wins and loses is to make two “if” wagers putting each group first. Rather than wagering $110 in ” Team An if Team B,” you would wager only $55 in ” Team An in the event that Team B.” and make a second “if” bet switching the request for the groups for another $55. The subsequent bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This kind of twofold bet, switching the request for similar two groups, is called an “if/turn around” or some of the time simply a “invert.”